Friday, February 19, 2010

Meet Joe Stack

This column is syndicated to 400 newspapers and a variety of news sites courtesy of McClatchy-Tribune Information Services and as printed in the Sacramamento Bee, the Cleveland Plain Dealer, the Lexington Herald-Leader, the Oregonian, the Tallahassee Democrat, Stars and Stripes, the Korea Herald, the Taiwan News and others. I am currently researching a book on the state of American society, its economy, society and technology and what the future may hold in store. I invite your stories and feedback. Thanks.

Joe Stack Took Our Anger and Fear Too Far
By Richard Parker

AUSTIN – By night, the shattered government offices are lit up by the floodlights of emergency crews and investigators. Hours after Joseph Stack, a failed software engineer and part-time musician, slammed a single engine plane into this building two bodies are pulled from the black glass and a single question emerges: Why?

It is tempting to fit Stack into a neat box: crazed lunatic, right-wing domestic terrorist, left-wing nut. Whatever he was in life he is certainly this in death: A killer. But he may epitomize something larger than himself. No, we are not all suicidal murderers. But in the midst of a crushing recession, strewn with the rubble of failed private and public institutions, we all live edgily along the same continuum of disappointment, anxiety, fear and yes, anger.

Stack’s suicide note was neither illiterate nor incoherent. It angrily laid personal failure and long-standing grudges at the feet of others, yes, but accurately summed up recent American political and economic history. Big industry skillfully tapped big government for big favors. “From each, according to his ability,” he wrote, mocking Marxism, “to each according to his greed.”

Indeed, one could only fault Stack’s history for being too kind. In fact, for the last three decades, the telecommunications, pharmaceutical, insurance, auto, airline and banking industries all marched to Washington to receive tax breaks, de-regulation and bailouts. And this history lives.

Right now in Washington, a handful of would-be reformers in Congress argues that the financial collapse of 2008 may have been triggered in part by final de-regulation of the banking industry of 1999, namely the repeal of the Depression-era Glass-Steagall Act.

They suggest that re-imposing Glass-Steagall might be a good idea. And the banks are fighting it, tooth and nail. After all, the banks bought and paid for that repeal: investing $300 million in lobbying. Forget, for a moment, that the banks promptly plunged the country into recession – only to be bailed out by the very government they no longer needed.

On the day of Stack’s violence everyone I interview who has read his suicide note has the same reaction: No, he should not have tried to kill anyone to make his point and so he deserved to die. And yes, the guy did have a point. And the people I interviewed – who ran the political and economic spectrum, from small businessman to tony suburban mother surrounded by neighbors in upside-down houses – could identify with disappointment, anxiety, fear and even anger.

Why? Simple: The grinding long-term, economic pressure that most Americans are under and the erosion of their long-held American dream of upward mobility. “The meritocratic ideal is in trouble in America. Income inequality is growing to levels not seen since the Gilded Age, around the 1880s. But social mobility is not increasing at anything like the same pace: would-be Horatio Algers are finding it no easier to climb from rags to riches while the children of the privileged have a greater chance of staying at the top of the social heap.”

The source of this rant? The Economist magazine, the required reading of the financial class, which went on in 2005 to note that between 1979 and 2000 real income of households in the bottom fifth grew 6.4 % while that of households in the top fifth grew 70%. Yet the income of the top 1 percent grew 184%. That top 1 percent of households held 33.4% of all net worth, a concentration of wealth not seen since before the Great Depression.

Fast forward to now. Nearly 35 percent of all income growth in the last 30 years has gone to the top one-tenth of the top 1 percent, according to the left-leaning Economic Policy Institute, while the bottom 90 percent has earned just 15.9 percent. The net effect is a long and persistent squeeze on the middle class.

Long before hardly anyone heard of Joe Stack, I began interviewing from all walks of life and political perspectives. To a man and woman all professed that they are neither getting ahead nor laying the groundwork for their children to do so. One man heard me relate these views, dropped his head and simply said, “I thought it was just me.” Indeed, it is not.

Nearing 11:00 p.m. a friendly cop suggests a back route to view the crash site. The windows are blown to the fifth floor at least and the lot is filling with official vehicles. The FBI has taken over the entire scene, the cop says. One in a metropolitan area of 1.6 million people has violently snapped. The rest go on living with their disappointment, anxiety, fear and yes, anger.

Richard Parker is a publishing executive and journalist. He is a former Knight-Ridder national correspondent and the former visiting professional in journalism at the University of Texas. He is researching a book on the outlook of American society tentatively entitled Project X; he can be contacted at info@parker-media.com or at his blog, http://projectxusa.blogspot.com/. Researcher Molly Maroney contributed to this article.




16 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  2. There are better ways to fix things then "Trying" to burn your house down that your family has to live in regardless if you are going to kill yourself (selfish) and flying a plan into a public building killing possibly people that had nothing to do with his anger. Plus the repairs of this building are going to be paid for by tax payers. So if you don't think you are paying too many taxes then I suggest not damaging public buildings. ADD has nothing to do with grammar and chronic boredom on anything so that was a completely irrelevant comment Joe. Jeff you are right but to make your argument more effective try not to be so attacking like people will respect your opinion more whether or not they are on your side. Jeff does ass to the conversation just the opposite side of the issue. You learn more about things if you take in both sides of each issue. Personally I think this was more for personal gain (as much gain as you can have after death) or an irrational act of anger. As far a Social Security goes it is a failing system and I have been paying into it since I was 16 and I will never see a dime, but that is okay by me because my grandparents are getting taking care of. If you are worried about not having money when you get older then saving is the key. I am almost 21 and I realize that is young but I have saved over 2000 all ready for after my retirement. My father always taught me that you cannot expect other people to help you, you have to be able to rely on yourself and if you cannot do that then you cannot complain about the things that are given to you.

    by Amanda Leigh Beck
    (Texas Lutheran)
    Facebook

    ReplyDelete
  3. I know that I cannot be the only person that understands that Joe Stack lost his "Right sense of mind", that he was beating down by a system that was suppose to be there to protect him. There is no way he graduated college and said "Guess, what, if someone does me wrong I will do damage to them and I do not care who is in the way". Granted We The People are suppose to be responsible beings, but we are not suppose to be "Set up to Fail", and from my experience, that is what I believe has happened here. Mental Health does not get treated the way it needs to in America, and trust me, there will be alot more people that will start "getting even" that do not have "mental stability"..R.I.P Joseph Stack

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think everyone knows why he did it. The problem with this whole this is people are looking up to him that he did this for them and other crazy things. Saying he is like MLK and the US Military is crazyness. This man needed help and fought the wrong way to get it.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Its uncomfortable to acknowledge it but Stack is just another example of the unequal application of the law in this country. A middleclass guy like Stack is hounded and beaten down by the IRS while nothing is done to the big shots who violate the same laws.

    Look at our self admitted tax cheat of a Treasury Secretary or any number of Congressman and Senators who simply 'amend' their disclosure and tax returns when caught concealing income, accepting below market rate loans etc. Why isn't the IRS and FBI concerned with those violations.

    IF we have become a nation of men and not laws then what else is left but to overthrow the regime?

    By Sangell
    mcclatchydc.com

    ReplyDelete
  6. Stack's financial and IRS problems were of his own making. No one forced him to try to defraud the government. No one forced him to try shaky accounting practices with the IRS. He got busted trying to flake out on non-existent tax issues and his fragile, narcissistic mentality couldn't handle that not everybody wanted to kiss his pansy rearend.
    And of course, no one forced him to try to murder his own family, now homeless. And no one forced him to murder someone in that building. As if the people in that building had anything to do with his shady business practices.

    By SylvreWolfe
    mcclatchydc.com

    ReplyDelete
  7. the writer has a point. Unless the people wake up the country will go down the tube. The rich never look at he future and have been the reason for the destruction of every country on earth.

    By mfellion
    mcclatchydc.com

    ReplyDelete
  8. So the banks spent $300 million lobbying so they could ruin the economy through operating deregulated? ANOTHER reason to totally ban lobbying. It is, after all, just a form of graft.

    By capnmike
    mcclatchydc.com

    ReplyDelete
  9. According to the book secrets of the temple all recessions since WWII were created by the banks to regulate the economy except possibly this one. it is possible that this one was initially also created and it got out of hand. they create recessions knowing in will kill 50,000 americans each time due to stress, suicide, etc. Banks make their biggest long term profits taking back real estate which is then resold during recessions. The people are only milk cows to be periodically harvested like a crop. You have to think long term on this not in yearly installments, The mafia about 12 years ago entered wall street banks to protect its investments from sloppy banking practices. So organized crime now runs the boards of major banks. Think about it all. how does it feel to be harvested.

    by rockman
    mcclatchydc.com

    ReplyDelete
  10. or as J.K. Gailbraith put it, " We see these recessions/depressions every 20-30 years, just long enough for people to forget the last debacle or a new generation of suckers born that can't remember." Interesting that the so-called liberal media never reports on this fact, or the fact of the biggest redistibution of wealth has already occurred circa 1980-present, a process that was started when Obama was 18. That Obama- what a clever 18 year old- or could some other people in power @ that time be responsible? No. Blame Obama. It's easier than thinking or educating ones self.

    By Vance
    mcclatchydc.com

    ReplyDelete
  11. Dear rockman, Ask the information awareness office?. If the fat Controller passes your request down to the Minister for information, Mr Winston Smith, the Minister of information may grant your request and satisfy you with the propaganda that you have been swallowing since the moment you developed the ability to think, or not think for that matter. You are not being harvested, you are being deprived of the ability to Think. The American People are not your enemy, The government treat us like a Herd of social animals and they are aware of our instincs. The as yet Power of the worldwide web will determine our future. Truth to Power. p.s. look around you, can you see equality anywhere in the world. There are no more secrets?

    by kirktonhun
    mcclatchydc.com

    ReplyDelete
  12. All I am trying to do is bring meaning to life, and perhaps try to understand what the meaning behind Joe Stacks existence was. His manifesto and violent acts were his means of communication to others. What it seems is that people are experiencing hostility. This causes us to be anxious, and to begin thinking about the issues that are in front of us. I hope people become anxious, and begin to question the information that others feed us, and to learn to be more critical of the sources of our information.So, either they are going to anger you, or your going to lie to yourself that they are not true, and repress these thoughts because you do not want to possibly go as deep into the issue that this person did, and understand how it affected his life, at that level. The truth is that this person felt controlled. Peoples lives are destroyed because of control. How about some deep thought into the issue, and then maybe we will learn what we will stand up for. What are the things worth dying for. it is critical points in life that we are truely living, when we make a choice to take courage and take a leap into the uknown future. i believe that Joe Stack took this leap, and whether he fell on his face or not was that risk called living life. He lieved life, rather then go back and do the same things day in and day out, leading to depression, and unhappiness. It's time we stop repeating our lives day in and day out, becoming numb to the events that surround up. The first step is education, and discussing what is opressing us.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Sage,

    For what it's worth I thought that what you said was very well said, indeed. To a degree -- even though I have a book project in mind -- I've been wondering what to make of the last few days. Watching what the commentariat has generally said -- pegging this is a left-wing plot or a right-wing plot or a Tea Party thing -- seems so incredibly close-minded. Seeing some people, particularly on one Facebook page, try to have a discussion about just what is going on, without jumping to one handy arm chair conclusion or another, is encouraging. I don't know if Joe Stack was personally one thing or another; I do know that his words caused me to do two things:

    Stop and think.

    ReplyDelete
  14. So, why do YOU think he did it? Or more importantly let me ask this: What do you think it means.... to you?

    ReplyDelete
  15. While my initial column focused on Joe Stack (and I'm still very interested in what others think about what the incident meant to them), I'm just busy wondering and researching what's going on to our society. I look at the effects of capital, technology and the failure of politics in the last decade to 30 years and it leads to some of the distressing statistics you see above.

    I also see -- in terms of capital -- an industry, a phenomena, that seems increasingly beyond our control and contributing the issues I've described. This series by McClatchy newspapers is instructive in this regard; McClatchy is a big newspaper chain, not a far right or left news site -- which is one reason I find the investigation interesting. For purposes of full disclosure I am a veteran of McClatchy's predecessor, Knight Ridder.

    Long story short, the series is the ONLY one that I have found that explores the potential wrongdoing of one of the few surviving investment banks, Goldman-Sachs which reportedly sold mortgage-backed financial instruments -- a cynic would say dumped them -- even as it promoted, marketed and sold them. It's a little dry but worth reading, or at least having a look....

    http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2009/11/01/77791/how-goldman-secretly-bet-on-the.html

    ReplyDelete